Boris’ travels and the “left behind towns”

The cycle of underinvestment and deprivation must stop

Last week, the new Prime Minister, Boris Johnson gave his first speech from the rose garden of No.10. Cash giveaways are of course a feature of any new administration, with the usual suspects, the Police and NHS receiving additional funds.  However, later on in his speech, Mr Johnson spoke of the country’s ‘left behind towns’ and redressing imbalances in infrastructure, productivity and business support in regions outside of London. Notable too is his decision for his first appearance as Prime Minister to be held in Manchester, and the announcement of a much needed trans-Pennine high speed link between Leeds and Manchester.  The devolved administrations also look set to receive a cash injection from the new Johnson administration, with £300 million for boosting growth and economic development.  Could this new regional focus provide the shot in the arm that the UK’s regions and nations need to grow and thrive? Will this Government herald in a new Britain of productive and heaving metropolises?

Over the last few weeks, ICAEW has been consulting with its members across the UK’s regions and nations to inform its response to the Treasury Select Committee’s Inquiry into regional imbalances in the UK economy. It is fair to say that whilst the shift towards regional economic development through the Local Enterprise Partnerships has been a step in the right direction, the members we spoke to felt that there was a long way to go to bring regional economies in line with that of London.

The consultation participants we spoke with highlighted lack of infrastructure, less than vibrant business ecosystems and most crushingly, a dearth of opportunities for young workers as key factors preventing economic development and improved social outcomes in areas outside London. They also noted lower per head spending on things like transport and education as obstacles to attracting inward investment, with large businesses being deterred by a lack of road and rail connections and a skilled local workforce. 

In short, what we saw in our consultation was a true chicken and egg scenario.  Treasury Green Book rules which state that the national interest is of importance when evaluating local transport infrastructure projects, are actually starving the regions outside of London of capital because they require there to be existing demand for spending in a region.  This lack of infrastructure, however, means that businesses are simply not investing in these areas because of poor transport connectivity. 

Even worse is the effect that this lack of investment and confidence in the regions is having on their current and future workforces, with young, ambitious people leaving for the bright lights of the big cities, or simply resolving not to go for that high-lying career at all to stay in their home region. ICAEW is clear that this cycle of underinvestment and deprivation must stop and that Government should prioritise the creation of thriving and varied business environments to spread success and opportunity across the country.

Whilst the impact of the new Government’s regional funding giveaway remains to be seen, it is obvious that there is an urgent need to act on regional imbalances. ICAEW knows that its network of Chartered Accountants have an important role to play in creating a prosperous and strong UK economy.  We will continue to work with local business policymakers and Government centrally to ensure that our members are able to feed in their considerable expertise to help businesses and opportunity grow in the regions, and please do get in touch with me ( to ask about the opportunities to contribute in your area.


  • It’s Fox’s turn to broadcast the highlight of the NFL season in 2020 and all 77 in-game spots are sold, with a top price of $5.6m for thirty seconds, according to reports, and an average of $5.2m.

  • Ultimately, they settled in as the AL Wild Card road team, but managed to blow past the A’s and earn a spot against Houston in the ALDS.

  • I think we should take a leaf, or several, from the economist Schumaker, whose teachings should now be back in current vogue [eg environment, sustainable development and the like]. Our out of London areas need rebranding with his "Small is Beautiful" rather than all this relentless "Bigger is better". Then put all this into a rebranding exercise - huge to be effective - to include "Right Behind OUR Towns" not left-behind towns. We can follow the teachings of El Donald and Le Boris and be perhaps "economical" with the truth to push this along. No need for fake news and outright lies - is there?

  • "high-lying career" is presumably a typo. I have visited some left behind towns. It is gruelling and, frankly, heartbreaking. It's sickening when I visit London and see the ridiculous wealth being wasted in the square mile. I also can't believe a single word that comes out of our current PM's mouth. We all have a lot to learn from the deprivation in our regions perpetuated over decades. We all need to take a good look at ourselves and I am incredibly grateful that our institute is acknowledging the unfairness. I recently overheard someone with a London accent in one of our left behind North East towns saying he "thought it would be better up here" - clearly not what he was finding. There is very little hope in that town, very little work. London councils ship people out of London and to live in other deprived areas to get them out of London and let even more money in. It is a very very sick society and I think all our members will miss out on the full horror but most of all those in London will.  I am so grateful we still manage - just about - to also be regional and to start realising how objectionable it is for one tiny section of the country to drain all the wealth and hope away, and to take people's pride and let it become arrogance.

  • The only way things will change is by the government forcing jobs out of London, when of course the poor Londoner's will complain and camp outside of parliament until the MPs change the policy.