Blogs and Discussions
Travel, Tourism & Hospitality
Career Breakers Community
Academia & Education Community
Energy & Natural Resources Community
PAYE and Employers
In order to participate, you must join Tech News – click to join the group
Scalable learning and what it means for you
18 days ago
Subscribe by email
Scalable learning and what it means for you
23 Jun 2020
I am currently reading a book called
The Technology Fallacy: How People Are the Real Key to Digital Transformation
by a team of researchers at MIT and Deloitte
As you can tell, it is the sort of book that puts its main argument in the title, but I think it is a good argument and would highly recommend the book. It is based of four years of surveys and interviews on the subject of digital disruption, although they prefer the term ‘digital maturity’. They open with the dramatic finding that, whereas 87% of their respondents recognise that digital disruption is very real in their industry, only 44% think that their organisation is doing enough to respond to it. A sobering gap for anyone running a business, or indeed a business unit.
However, the main idea I wanted to highlight in this post is one they draw from the work of John Hagel, a highly respected management consultant and co-founder of
Deloitte’s Center for the Edge
. To summarise (
there is more detail in an interview with Forbes here
), Hagel argues that the emergence of large companies over the nineteenth and twentieth centuries was driven by a need for ‘scalable efficiency’. It was simply more efficient to have large numbers of people and machines working together in a co-ordinated fashion than spread across different organisations, and to some extent it still is.
However, there are signs that, as communication technology has advanced, this is becoming less important (as the authors note elsewhere in the book, the drive for efficiency matters, but is subject to diminishing returns over time, whereas the returns from innovation can be exponential). Scalable efficiency is being replaced is being replaced as a rationale for growth with ‘scalable learning’. Large organisations may have an advantage over smaller ones if they use their size to provide more learning opportunities for their employees and in capturing and building on that learning. This will enable them to attract the brightest and best and so continue the cycle.
Large organisations may have an advantage, but then again they may not. It could be that they provide greater support for employees to learn, use their resources to support experiments and innovations that may or may not work and encourage sharing of perspectives and ideas. Then again, the opposite is also possible, particularly if the organisation’s overriding goal is still scalable efficiency. It may well be that the weight of bureaucracy and top-down decision-making stifles risk-taking and innovation, and breeds a compliance mindset where employees do as they are told and are not especially encouraged or supported in their learning. Of course, small organisations are not immune from top-down decision-making and risk aversion either, but it is at least possible that smaller organisations will have some advantages here, which in turn could lead to entire industries being reshaped.
This idea really resonates with me. If I consider why I left certain jobs in the past, it was often because I really didn’t think I was learning very much in them. I’ve always felt that a good test of the mantra that “people are our greatest asset” is how far an organisation commits resources and priority to giving its employees opportunities for learning and development. So, if there is anything at all in this idea then there is a major challenge for both employers and individuals. For employers, rather than being a nice-to-have, learning needs to be a central plank of strategy and drive decision-making. For individuals, the challenge is to ensure that they are constantly learning and improving skills and knowledge, whether through formal training, informal exploration or in the nature of the job. If Hagel is right, and I suspect he is, the future belongs to organisations and individuals who can get this right.
More content on this topic ...
The new norm - business and personal impacts of co…
Ethics and technology – latest thinking from IESBA
What has happened to voice technology in accounting…
What happens to cash after COVID-19?
Excel Tip of the Week #349 - Rounding redux
This blog is brought to you by the Excel Community where you can find additional blogs, extended articles…
See all blogs
What are debt consolidation loans to pay off all debt into one payment?
5 days ago
30 days ago
Which ICO listing platform is the best, and why?
18 days ago
How to disable or Enable Right Click on a Website
25 days ago
How Blockchain Technology Works ?
8 months ago
See all discussions
Gridlines releases free essential financial modelling course
ICAEW has previously partnered with Gridlines, the current owners of financial modelling contest ModelOff. As a step to help those in the modelling community...
ICAEW Coronavirus hub
ICAEW has created a coronavirus hub where you can find practical technical and business advice. All material is fee. Please visit w ww.icaew.com/insights...
ICO seeks a secondee to work on auditing of AI
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) shares the below message: Wanted: ICO AI Auditing Secondee In February 2020, the ICO launched its consultation...
Spreadsheet review volunteers sought
Are you interested in spreadsheet review and validation? The Excel Community Advisory Committee is forming a working group to produce a short guide to...
Excel Community volunteers sought
ICAEW's Excel Community exists to promote good spreadsheet practice and help accountants improve their Excel efficiency and capabilities. Since its inception...
See all announcements