There is an ever-developing focus on the UK’s dirty money problem, officially estimated to run into the hundreds of billions of pounds and so ran a recent headline in the FT “UK professional groups criticised over money laundering prevention.”
I quote below from the FT before turning to the Tourism and Hospitality sector.
Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision
A report by the Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision, (OPBAS) found that nearly all of the 22 professional bodies overseen by OPBAS, have failed to gather full basic information on members as a first step. Meanwhile 80 per cent lack appropriate governance arrangements to tackle dirty money in their profession, and nearly a quarter of the bodies do not undertake any form of money laundering supervision at all, despite there being EU rules in place demanding that they do.
OPBAS was set up last year as part of the government’s plans to make the UK a more hostile environment for ill-gotten gains.
OPBAS is meant to ensure consistent supervision among the bodies. Alison Barker, the FCA’s director of specialist supervision, said: “The accountancy sector and many smaller professional bodies focus on representing their members, rather than robustly supervising standards. Nicky Morgan MP, chair of the Commons Treasury committee, said the statistics in the OPBAS report were “shocking”. “They reveal real vulnerabilities in the UK,” she said. “OPBAS has rightly asked the professional body supervisors to address the findings in their report. The Treasury committee will want to see evidence that urgent action is being taken.”
Tourism and Hospitality sector and Money Laundering
The ICAEW has done a lot of work in the area of Money Laundering. Professional bodies such as those for Accountants, Lawyers, Banks (UK & International) and other Financial Sector businesses maintain significant infrastructure assets (systems and people) in order to address Money laundering and the issue of illegal activities that flow from such money.
When I looked for similar endeavours in the Travel and Leisure sector, I found little evidence of guidance issued by businesses or public bodies addressing Money Laundering and control over consumer funds received.
Tourists inbound and outbound use the services of the banking sector, insurance sector, money transfer and foreign exchange sectors and credit cards providers.
There is a lot of guidance on Money Laundering and Terrorist financing in general but little seems to have been done to apply it to the Travel and Leisure sector. It would be very helpful if find out if there any meaningful and substantive written guidance and control procedures for this sector. Businesses in this sector have compliance requirements but they are of a general nature and certainly nothing close to the specific and direct compliance obligations and documentary requirements which bodies overseen by OPBAS have to comply with.
I sampled a selection of websites for bodies such as CAA, ABTA, HOSPA, other various Travel Licencing and Membership Bodies and websites for the booking conditions of the online travel booking industry, hotels, airlines, cruise businesses and train companies. The results of my search serve to confirm there is a paucity of information and guidance on compliance so far as money laundering and the collection of consumer funds is concerned.
This is a matter of concern in that it appears regulators believe either this sector does not need OPBAS type of scrutiny or they believe the Tourism and Hospitality businesses can be policed under the existing non-specific structures despite the size and importance of the sector to the UK economy.
This is surprising when one considers the sheer breadth and depth of this sector:
Regulation in the Tourism and Hospitality sector
Tourism and Hospitality is already very heavily regulated. For entirely understandable and valid reasons is has to comply with a raft of regulations, legislation and guidance on consumer protection and client funds (ATOL – Trust Accounts and Bonds), GDPR, Health & Safety, VAT compliance, Pensions, Tips and a host of other obligations. The financial and administrative burden of these compliance requirements is already quite onerous and grows as each year passes.
Brexit is very likely going to impose quite significant additional burdens with the UK being “outside” Europe having to work with large Tourist flows both outbound to Europe and Inbound.
Awareness and Enforcement
The sector if it was regulated for money laundering probably has compliance issues, enforcement is low and the sector’s understanding of the rules and threats could be enhanced. awareness of money laundering rules in the sector probably needs to be increased with an emphasis on both self-regulation and reporting suspicious transactions.
Despite the lack of direct regulation, it is clear that Trading Standards, HM Revenue & Customs presumably in conjunction with the Police have carried out some prosecutions of travel businesses for money laundering including a prosecution for the laundering of £500m of cash at a Travel Agency business in 2015.
It is worth noting that fewer and fewer transactions involve cash with funds received either from credit cards or bank transfers which can be traced.
The Financial Action Task Force published its mutual evaluation report of the United Kingdom’s AML/CTF regime. The report recognised that the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) regime was the strongest of any country assessed to date. The UK received the highest rating possible in four areas of the report, and received a rating of ‘substantial’ (the second highest rating) in a further four areas.
There are some checks and balances in place in the Tourism and Hospitality sector
The current range of checks and balances in place emanate from the Tourism and Hospitality Industry’s engagement with:
The fact that certain businesses have to be licenced, particularly by ATOL in the outbound sector also adds to the regulation indirectly.